RINF vs. LDRI
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and LDRI (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index while LDRI tracks the BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RINF returned 2.48% vs 4.51% for LDRI. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. RINF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LDRI.
Performance
RINF vs. LDRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than LDRI's 1.92% return.
RINF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
LDRI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINF vs. LDRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 2.37% | 1.64% | 0.24% |
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 1.92% | 5.94% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and LDRI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. LDRI — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
LDRI
RINF vs. LDRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RINF | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.54 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 7.56 | -6.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 20.35 | -18.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RINF | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 2.41 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 2.26 | -2.18 |
Drawdowns
RINF vs. LDRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than LDRI's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and LDRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -0.85% | -42.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -0.60% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.04% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.45% | -0.20% | -16.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 0.22% | +1.15% |
Volatility
RINF vs. LDRI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) at 0.46%. This indicates that RINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 0.46% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 1.38% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.49% | 1.88% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 2.28% | +10.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.57% | 2.28% | +10.29% |
RINF vs. LDRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRI's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RINF vs. LDRI - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than LDRI's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 3.52% | 4.23% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.70% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and LDRI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RINF has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to LDRI (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs LDRI's -0.85%.
On 1-year performance, LDRI leads with 4.51% vs 2.48% for RINF. On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, LDRI has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LDRI has performed better with a 4.51% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
RINF has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 3.52% for LDRI.
RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while LDRI tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RINF and 0.10% for LDRI.
LDRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINF and LDRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer