RINF vs. ARCC
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RINF returned 4.69%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for ARCC. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RINF vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's 2.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RINF has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 4.69%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.
RINF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.99%
ARCC
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- -3.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.24M | $87.43M | $94.49M | |
| $105.36K | $112.30K | $130.83K |
RINF vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 2.82% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | 8.77% | 16.20% | 1.98% | 1.82% | -0.79% | -1.70% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 2.33% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and ARCC is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
ARCC
RINF vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RINF | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.99 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.19 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | -0.35 | +4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RINF vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -79.36% | +35.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -17.35% | +15.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -19.35% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | -21.76% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | -56.77% | +27.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -6.86% | +6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -9.12% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 9.53% | -8.61% |
Volatility
RINF vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) is 1.51%, while Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that RINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 5.24% | -3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 14.96% | -11.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 19.13% | -14.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 20.03% | -7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 25.60% | -13.06% |
Dividends
RINF vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than ARCC's 9.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 9.77% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.65% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and ARCC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARCC has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to RINF (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
RINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINF and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer