PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

RIDH.TO (RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF) and XML.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. RIDH.TO is actively managed, while XML.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RIDH.TO returned 11.11%/yr vs 7.84%/yr for XML.TO. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RIDH.TO charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XML.TO.

Performance

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIDH.TO achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than XML.TO's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RIDH.TO has outperformed XML.TO with an annualized return of 11.11%, while XML.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.84% annualized return.

RIDH.TO

1D
-1.23%
1M
1.94%
6M
10.08%
YTD
16.37%
1Y
36.80%
3Y*
21.98%
5Y*
15.14%
10Y*
11.11%
ALL TIME*
10.01%

XML.TO

1D
-0.35%
1M
4.79%
6M
8.74%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
7.84%
ALL TIME*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

RIDH.TO

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF
CA$18.38KCA$62.92KCA$73.93K

XML.TO

iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
CA$8.48KCA$7.87KCA$8.75K

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF		16.37%32.49%12.69%17.54%-3.96%19.17%-4.59%19.55%-9.26%9.71%
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		11.20%17.56%14.13%11.69%-6.94%13.27%-5.87%16.26%-4.34%15.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RIDH.TO and XML.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2016

0.46

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RIDH.TO
XML.TO

Financial Services

19.6%
19.7%

Industrials

19.1%
15.7%

Technology

9.8%
4.4%

Healthcare

9.5%
12.2%

Utilities

8.0%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
12.6%

Communication Services

7.1%
9.1%

Basic Materials

6.9%
1.6%

Energy

4.4%
7.7%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.9%

Financial Services

RIDH.TO
19.6%
XML.TO
19.7%

Industrials

RIDH.TO
19.1%
XML.TO
15.7%

Technology

RIDH.TO
9.8%
XML.TO
4.4%

Healthcare

RIDH.TO
9.5%
XML.TO
12.2%

Utilities

RIDH.TO
8.0%
XML.TO
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

RIDH.TO
7.7%
XML.TO
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

RIDH.TO
7.3%
XML.TO
12.6%

Communication Services

RIDH.TO
7.1%
XML.TO
9.1%

Basic Materials

RIDH.TO
6.9%
XML.TO
1.6%

Energy

RIDH.TO
4.4%
XML.TO
7.7%

Real Estate

RIDH.TO
0.6%
XML.TO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with RIDH.TO:
RIDH.TO vs. TILV.TORIDH.TO vs. RPF.TORIDH.TO vs. QDX.TORIDH.TO vs. RCDC.TORIDH.TO vs. FCRI.TORIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEORIDH.TO vs. RUD.TO
Often compared with XML.TO:
XML.TO vs. XIN.TOXML.TO vs. XSP.TOXML.TO vs. XMI.TOXML.TO vs. XEQT.TOXML.TO vs. HXQ.TOXML.TO vs. XMU.TOXML.TO vs. XMW.TO

Return for Risk

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
RIDH.TO
RIDH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
XML.TO
XML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RIDH.TOXML.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.86
1.93

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.85
2.74

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.41

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

2.79

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.82

8.69

+9.12

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the XML.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIDH.TO and XML.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIDH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.53%, which is greater than XML.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIDH.TO and XML.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RIDH.TOXML.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.53%

-28.62%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-6.46%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

-7.46%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.01%

-12.34%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

-28.62%

-5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.35%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-3.42%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.07%

-0.14%

Volatility

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) at 2.05%. This indicates that RIDH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XML.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RIDH.TOXML.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

2.05%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

7.83%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

9.32%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

9.82%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

11.93%

+3.81%

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIDH.TO has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than XML.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIDH.TO vs. XML.TO - Dividend Comparison

RIDH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than XML.TO's 2.61% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF		3.06%3.10%3.69%3.70%4.41%2.63%3.63%4.07%4.55%2.91%3.33%3.28%
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.61%2.76%2.67%2.56%2.02%1.92%1.11%3.62%2.79%1.91%3.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RIDH.TO and XML.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XML.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XML.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RIDH.TO.

They also come from different issuers: RBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for RIDH.TO and 0.40% for XML.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIDH.TO and XML.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer