PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XML.TO vs. XIN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO).

XML.TO and XIN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XML.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2016. XIN.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2001. Both XML.TO and XIN.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		6.47%17.56%14.13%11.69%-6.94%13.27%-5.87%16.26%-3.28%15.15%
XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.31%20.30%14.27%19.36%1.59%25.71%-0.02%24.88%-10.05%16.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XML.TO achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than XIN.TO's 2.31% return.

XML.TO

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
6.47%
6M
11.95%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
—

XIN.TO

1D
2.46%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
2.31%
6M
7.92%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XML.TO:
XML.TO vs. HXQ.TOXML.TO vs. XEQT.TOXML.TO vs. XMW.TOXML.TO vs. XSP.TOXML.TO vs. XMI.TOXML.TO vs. XMU.TOXML.TO vs. XMy.TO
Often compared with XIN.TO:
XIN.TO vs. XEF.TOXIN.TO vs. XFH.TOXIN.TO vs. XWD.TOXIN.TO vs. XIU.TOXIN.TO vs. GBAL.TOXIN.TO vs. XUS-U.TOXIN.TO vs. XDW0.L

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XML.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XIN.TO's 0.52% expense ratio.

XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Return for Risk

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XML.TO
XML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
XIN.TO
XIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XML.TOXIN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

1.08

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

1.58

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.52

+0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.16

6.41

+3.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XML.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the XIN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XML.TO and XIN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XML.TOXIN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.08

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.00

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.75

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.38

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between XML.TO and XIN.TO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO - Dividend Comparison

XML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than XIN.TO's 2.84% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.59%2.76%2.67%2.56%2.02%1.92%1.11%3.62%2.77%1.92%3.34%0.00%
XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.84%2.90%2.66%2.60%2.27%2.98%2.15%3.06%3.43%2.60%2.90%2.80%

Drawdowns

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XML.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, smaller than the maximum XIN.TO drawdown of -58.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XML.TO and XIN.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XML.TOXIN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.62%

-58.14%

+29.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-11.57%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.34%

-15.40%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.68%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-6.09%

+4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-12.43%

+9.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.74%

-1.12%

Volatility

XML.TO vs. XIN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) is 4.20%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that XML.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XML.TOXIN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

6.47%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

10.07%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

16.89%

-5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.67%

14.60%

-4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.13%

16.47%

-4.34%