XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO).

XML.TO and XEQT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XML.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2016. XEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019.

Performance

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XML.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	6.47%	17.56%	14.13%	11.69%	-6.94%	13.27%	-5.87%	6.90%
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio	0.66%	19.47%	24.36%	17.25%	-11.01%	18.94%	11.82%	9.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XML.TO achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than XEQT.TO's 0.66% return.

XML.TO

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 11.95%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: —

XEQT.TO

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -4.49%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 20.05%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XML.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

XML.TO

iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

XEQT.TO

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Return for Risk

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XML.TO

XML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
XML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
XML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
XML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

XEQT.TO

XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XML.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.26	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	1.76	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.27	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	1.75	+0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.16	7.85	+2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XML.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XML.TO and XEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XML.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	1.26	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	0.91	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.85	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between XML.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

XML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
XML.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	2.59%	2.76%	2.67%	2.56%	2.02%	1.92%	1.11%	3.62%	2.77%	1.92%	3.34%
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio	1.66%	1.66%	2.01%	2.07%	2.12%	1.64%	1.66%	1.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XML.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, roughly equal to the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XML.TO and XEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XML.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.62%	-29.74%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.92%	-11.78%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.34%	-19.56%	+7.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-5.08%	+3.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-4.20%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	2.63%	-1.01%

Volatility

XML.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) is 4.20%, while iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that XML.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XML.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	6.01%	-1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.58%	9.46%	-2.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.11%	15.98%	-4.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.67%	13.03%	-3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.13%	15.63%	-3.50%