PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIBIX vs. WOBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIBIX vs. WOBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIBIX achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than WOBDX's 0.16% return.


RIBIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-0.85%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*

WOBDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIBIX vs. WOBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund
-1.07%5.95%1.11%5.50%-14.47%-1.86%7.98%7.53%-0.60%
WOBDX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund
0.16%7.38%1.97%5.79%-12.35%-1.11%8.13%8.34%0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RIBIX and WOBDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.92

The correlation between RIBIX and WOBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIBIX vs. WOBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIBIX
RIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

WOBDX
WOBDX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WOBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WOBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIBIX vs. WOBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIBIXWOBDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.73

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

5.15

-2.75

RIBIX vs. WOBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the WOBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIBIX and WOBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIBIXWOBDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.33

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.07

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

1.17

-0.99

Drawdowns

RIBIX vs. WOBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, which is greater than WOBDX's maximum drawdown of -16.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and WOBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIBIXWOBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-16.65%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-2.99%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-5.96%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-16.65%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-1.89%

-4.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-1.90%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.00%

+0.12%

Volatility

RIBIX vs. WOBDX - Volatility Comparison

RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) at 1.27%. This indicates that RIBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIBIXWOBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.27%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.74%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

3.88%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

5.69%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.18%

4.70%

+0.48%

RIBIX vs. WOBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than WOBDX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIBIX vs. WOBDX - Dividend Comparison

RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than WOBDX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund
3.54%4.02%3.35%2.50%2.10%1.94%3.28%3.91%2.44%0.05%0.00%0.00%
WOBDX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund
4.08%3.97%3.95%3.51%2.68%2.82%4.00%3.23%2.91%2.88%2.84%2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, RIBIX and WOBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RIBIX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to WOBDX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIBIX dropped -19.37% vs WOBDX's -16.65%.

WOBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIBIX and WOBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer