RIBIX vs. RUSIX
RIBIX (RBC Impact Bond Fund) and RUSIX (RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund) are both mutual funds - RIBIX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by RBC, while RUSIX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by RBC. Over the past 5 years, RIBIX returned -1.57%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for RUSIX. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RIBIX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for RUSIX.
Performance
RIBIX vs. RUSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIBIX achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than RUSIX's 1.58% return.
RIBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 1Y
- -1.68%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.69%
RUSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RIBIX vs. RUSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | -3.09% | 5.95% | 1.11% | 5.50% | -14.47% | -1.86% | 7.98% | 7.53% | -0.60% | 0.00% |
RUSIX RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund | 1.58% | 4.53% | 6.78% | 8.13% | -1.43% | 0.10% | 2.58% | 4.18% | 1.60% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIBIX and RUSIX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIBIX vs. RUSIX — Risk / Return Rank
RIBIX
RUSIX
RIBIX vs. RUSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (RUSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIBIX | RUSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 2.41 | -1.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 9.48 | -9.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 29.98 | -30.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIBIX vs. RUSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, which is greater than RUSIX's maximum drawdown of -5.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and RUSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIBIX | RUSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.37% | -5.60% | -13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.09% | -0.40% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.25% | -0.40% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.98% | -3.83% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | 0.00% | -8.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -0.33% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 0.12% | +1.47% |
Volatility
RIBIX vs. RUSIX - Volatility Comparison
RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (RUSIX) at 0.14%. This indicates that RIBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIBIX | RUSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 0.14% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 0.96% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 1.46% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 1.54% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.16% | 1.47% | +3.69% |
RIBIX vs. RUSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than RUSIX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIBIX vs. RUSIX - Dividend Comparison
RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than RUSIX's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | 3.40% | 4.02% | 3.35% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 3.28% | 3.91% | 2.44% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RUSIX RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund | 3.89% | 4.33% | 4.61% | 4.64% | 2.37% | 0.91% | 1.82% | 2.76% | 2.41% | 1.83% | 1.57% | 1.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIBIX and RUSIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIBIX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to RUSIX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIBIX dropped -19.37% vs RUSIX's -5.60%.
RUSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIBIX and RUSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer