RIBIX vs. REMVX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX).

RIBIX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Dec 18, 2017. REMVX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Feb 8, 2018.

Performance

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund	-0.92%	5.95%	1.11%	5.50%	-14.47%	-1.86%	7.98%	7.53%	1.33%
REMVX RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund	4.24%	47.31%	4.58%	11.03%	-16.99%	3.71%	18.03%	16.00%	-11.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIBIX achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than REMVX's 4.24% return.

RIBIX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 6M: -0.38%
• 1Y: 1.63%
• 3Y*: 2.74%
• 5Y*: -0.68%
• 10Y*: —

REMVX

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -10.27%
• YTD: 4.24%
• 6M: 13.05%
• 1Y: 43.84%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 7.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than REMVX's 0.95% expense ratio.

REMVX

RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund

RIBIX

RBC Impact Bond Fund

Return for Risk

RIBIX vs. REMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIBIX

RIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
RIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
RIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
RIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
RIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

REMVX

REMVX Risk / Return Rank: 92
REMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
REMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
REMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
REMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
REMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RIBIX	REMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	2.35	-1.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	2.92	-2.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.46	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	2.72	-1.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.72	11.14	-8.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the REMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIBIX and REMVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RIBIX	REMVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42	2.35	-1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	0.41	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.44	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between RIBIX and REMVX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Dividend Comparison

RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than REMVX's 1.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund	3.77%	4.02%	3.35%	2.50%	2.10%	1.94%	3.28%	3.91%	2.44%	0.05%
REMVX RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund	1.95%	2.03%	5.02%	4.02%	7.02%	13.30%	0.38%	3.82%	2.51%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, smaller than the maximum REMVX drawdown of -36.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and REMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIBIX	REMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.37%	-36.92%	+17.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-15.08%	+12.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.98%	-36.42%	+17.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.29%	-12.41%	+6.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-11.54%	+5.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	3.68%	-2.51%

Volatility

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) is 1.67%, while RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that RIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIBIX	REMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	10.22%	-8.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	13.98%	-11.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.76%	18.99%	-14.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.94%	17.57%	-11.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.20%	19.49%	-14.29%