PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIBIX vs. REMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIBIX achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than REMVX's 30.50% return.


RIBIX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
1.01%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*

REMVX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.81%
YTD
30.50%
6M
32.61%
1Y
64.90%
3Y*
28.14%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund
-1.89%5.95%1.11%5.50%-14.47%-1.86%7.98%7.53%1.54%
REMVX
RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund
30.50%47.31%4.58%11.03%-16.99%3.71%18.03%16.00%-11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RIBIX and REMVX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

-0.01

The correlation between RIBIX and REMVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIBIX vs. REMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIBIX
RIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
RIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
RIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

REMVX
REMVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
REMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
REMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIBIXREMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.61

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

4.40

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

16.93

-15.91

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the REMVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIBIX and REMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, smaller than the maximum REMVX drawdown of -36.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and REMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIBIXREMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-36.92%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-15.08%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-18.15%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-35.51%

+16.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.21%

-1.27%

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-11.30%

+4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

3.90%

-2.68%

Volatility

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) is 1.11%, while RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that RIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIBIXREMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

10.60%

-9.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

18.90%

-15.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

20.98%

-16.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

18.57%

-12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.17%

19.90%

-14.73%

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than REMVX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIBIX vs. REMVX - Dividend Comparison

RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than REMVX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
REMVX
RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund
1.56%2.03%5.02%4.02%7.02%13.30%0.38%3.82%2.51%0.00%
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund
3.57%4.02%3.35%2.50%2.10%1.94%3.28%3.91%2.44%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIBIX and REMVX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMVX has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to RIBIX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIBIX dropped -19.37% vs REMVX's -36.92%.

REMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIBIX and REMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer