WOBDX vs. DBLTX
WOBDX (JPMorgan Core Bond Fund) and DBLTX (DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - WOBDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by JPMorgan, while DBLTX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 10 years, WOBDX returned 1.83%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for DBLTX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
WOBDX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOBDX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than DBLTX's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, WOBDX has outperformed DBLTX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while DBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return.
WOBDX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
DBLTX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
WOBDX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOBDX JPMorgan Core Bond Fund | 0.25% | 7.38% | 1.97% | 5.79% | -12.35% | -1.11% | 8.13% | 8.34% | 0.20% | 3.81% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.22% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOBDX and DBLTX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between WOBDX and DBLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOBDX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank
WOBDX
DBLTX
WOBDX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WOBDX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | 3.71 | +0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WOBDX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOBDX drawdown since its inception was -16.65%, roughly equal to the maximum DBLTX drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOBDX and DBLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOBDX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | -16.49% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -3.17% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.96% | -6.59% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.65% | -16.49% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.65% | -16.49% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -2.23% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -2.37% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 1.14% | -0.07% |
Volatility
WOBDX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOBDX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.12% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 2.86% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 3.81% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 5.61% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 4.42% | +0.29% |
WOBDX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WOBDX and DBLTX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
WOBDX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison
WOBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than DBLTX's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.90% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
WOBDX JPMorgan Core Bond Fund | 4.07% | 3.97% | 3.95% | 3.51% | 2.68% | 2.82% | 4.00% | 3.23% | 2.91% | 2.88% | 2.84% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, WOBDX and DBLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DBLTX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to WOBDX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOBDX dropped -16.65% vs DBLTX's -16.49%.
WOBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOBDX and DBLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer