PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOBDX vs. HLIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOBDX vs. HLIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOBDX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than HLIPX's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, WOBDX has underperformed HLIPX with an annualized return of 1.92%, while HLIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.34% annualized return.


WOBDX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.40%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
1.92%

HLIPX

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.73%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
2.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOBDX vs. HLIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOBDX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund
0.25%7.38%1.97%5.79%-12.35%-1.11%8.13%8.34%0.20%3.81%
HLIPX
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund
0.44%7.98%2.64%6.38%-12.69%-0.30%7.93%8.73%0.01%4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between WOBDX and HLIPX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 1993

0.90

The correlation between WOBDX and HLIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOBDX vs. HLIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOBDX
WOBDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
WOBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WOBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

HLIPX
HLIPX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HLIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOBDX vs. HLIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOBDXHLIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.77

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

5.34

-0.83

WOBDX vs. HLIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the HLIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOBDX and HLIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOBDXHLIPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.41

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.14

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.51

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

1.10

+0.07

Drawdowns

WOBDX vs. HLIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOBDX drawdown since its inception was -16.65%, roughly equal to the maximum HLIPX drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOBDX and HLIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOBDXHLIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.65%

-16.91%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-3.05%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.96%

-6.08%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.65%

-16.91%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.65%

-16.91%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.69%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-1.94%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.01%

-0.01%

Volatility

WOBDX vs. HLIPX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) have volatilities of 1.27% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOBDXHLIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

1.27%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

2.77%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

3.87%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

5.68%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

4.64%

+0.06%

WOBDX vs. HLIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOBDX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HLIPX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOBDX vs. HLIPX - Dividend Comparison

WOBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than HLIPX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIPX
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund
4.58%4.86%4.88%4.02%3.36%3.25%4.36%3.23%3.08%2.83%2.77%3.25%
WOBDX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund
4.07%3.97%3.95%3.51%2.68%2.82%4.00%3.23%2.91%2.88%2.84%2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, WOBDX and HLIPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HLIPX has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to WOBDX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOBDX dropped -16.65% vs HLIPX's -16.91%.

HLIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOBDX and HLIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer