PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIBIX vs. TRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIBIX vs. TRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIBIX achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than TRLVX's -0.05% return.


RIBIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-0.85%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*

TRLVX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.07%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
1.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIBIX vs. TRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund
-1.07%5.95%1.11%5.50%-14.47%-1.86%7.98%7.53%-0.60%
TRLVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.05%7.06%0.83%5.92%-15.66%-1.63%9.04%9.25%-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RIBIX and TRLVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.94

The correlation between RIBIX and TRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIBIX vs. TRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIBIX
RIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLVX
TRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIBIX vs. TRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIBIXTRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.46

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

4.39

-1.99

RIBIX vs. TRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the TRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIBIX and TRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIBIXTRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.17

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

1.02

-0.84

Drawdowns

RIBIX vs. TRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, smaller than the maximum TRLVX drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and TRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIBIXTRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-20.98%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-3.29%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-6.90%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-20.68%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-5.18%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-2.48%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.09%

+0.03%

Volatility

RIBIX vs. TRLVX - Volatility Comparison

RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIBIXTRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.41%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.97%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

4.13%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

6.38%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.18%

5.24%

-0.06%

RIBIX vs. TRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLVX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIBIX vs. TRLVX - Dividend Comparison

RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than TRLVX's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund
3.54%4.02%3.35%2.50%2.10%1.94%3.28%3.91%2.44%0.05%0.00%0.00%
TRLVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
3.67%3.52%4.01%3.38%1.80%1.90%5.98%3.73%2.77%2.36%4.46%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, RIBIX and TRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RIBIX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to TRLVX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIBIX dropped -19.37% vs TRLVX's -20.98%.

TRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIBIX and TRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer