PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRLVX vs. LSSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRLVX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLVX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLVX has underperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.52% annualized return.


TRLVX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.18%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
1.55%

LSSAX

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.48%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLVX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRLVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
0.16%7.06%0.83%5.92%-15.66%-1.63%9.04%9.25%-0.47%4.15%
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
1.24%8.32%3.94%7.01%-11.82%0.64%4.68%6.81%2.48%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLVX and LSSAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2006

0.81

The correlation between TRLVX and LSSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRLVX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLVX
TRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LSSAX
LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLVX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRLVXLSSAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

2.11

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

3.29

-1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

2.79

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.84

7.60

-2.76

TRLVX vs. LSSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the LSSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLVX and LSSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRLVXLSSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.11

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.25

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.58

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.95

+0.07

Drawdowns

TRLVX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLVX drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLVX and LSSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRLVXLSSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

-16.40%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-2.16%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.90%

-5.91%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.68%

-16.40%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.98%

-16.40%

-4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.98%

-0.61%

-4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-1.98%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.90%

+0.18%

Volatility

TRLVX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) have volatilities of 1.47% and 1.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRLVXLSSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.47%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.99%

2.66%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

4.11%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

5.78%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

4.42%

+0.82%

TRLVX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLVX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRLVX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison

TRLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than LSSAX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
4.34%4.23%4.54%5.65%6.47%6.38%5.95%5.48%5.62%5.42%5.12%5.20%
TRLVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
3.66%3.52%4.01%3.38%1.80%1.90%5.98%3.73%2.77%2.36%4.46%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRLVX and LSSAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSSAX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to TRLVX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLVX dropped -20.98% vs LSSAX's -16.40%.

LSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRLVX and LSSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer