TRLVX vs. TCPYX
TRLVX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund) and TCPYX (Touchstone Impact Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, TRLVX returned 1.49%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for TCPYX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRLVX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for TCPYX.
Performance
TRLVX vs. TCPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRLVX achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than TCPYX's 0.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRLVX having a 1.49% annualized return and TCPYX not far ahead at 1.51%.
TRLVX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- -0.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
TCPYX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
TRLVX vs. TCPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRLVX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.15% | 7.06% | 0.83% | 5.92% | -15.66% | -1.63% | 9.04% | 9.25% | -0.47% | 4.15% |
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 0.53% | 6.75% | 1.77% | 5.32% | -13.07% | -1.01% | 6.72% | 7.91% | 0.16% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRLVX and TCPYX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2009 | 0.89 |
The correlation between TRLVX and TCPYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRLVX vs. TCPYX — Risk / Return Rank
TRLVX
TCPYX
TRLVX vs. TCPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRLVX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.60 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 4.56 | -1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRLVX vs. TCPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRLVX drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than TCPYX's maximum drawdown of -18.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLVX and TCPYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRLVX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -18.12% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.29% | -2.92% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.90% | -5.79% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.68% | -18.12% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.98% | -18.12% | -2.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -1.98% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -3.22% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 1.03% | +0.14% |
Volatility
TRLVX vs. TCPYX - Volatility Comparison
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) at 1.06%. This indicates that TRLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRLVX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.06% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 2.85% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 3.88% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.38% | 5.90% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 4.85% | +0.40% |
TRLVX vs. TCPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRLVX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than TCPYX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRLVX vs. TCPYX - Dividend Comparison
TRLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than TCPYX's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 3.93% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.63% | 2.86% | 2.77% | 2.98% | 2.91% |
TRLVX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund | 3.67% | 3.52% | 4.01% | 3.38% | 1.80% | 1.90% | 5.98% | 3.73% | 2.77% | 2.36% | 4.46% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRLVX and TCPYX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRLVX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to TCPYX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLVX dropped -20.98% vs TCPYX's -18.12%.
TCPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRLVX and TCPYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer