RIBIX vs. LSSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX).
RIBIX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Dec 18, 2017. LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006.
Performance
RIBIX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIBIX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | -1.15% | 5.95% | 1.11% | 5.50% | -14.47% | -1.86% | 7.98% | 7.53% | -0.60% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.29% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 2.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIBIX achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.29% return.
RIBIX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 2.66%
- 5Y*
- -0.65%
- 10Y*
- —
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIBIX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIBIX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
RIBIX
LSSAX
RIBIX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIBIX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 1.61 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 2.49 | -1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 3.41 | -2.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 10.00 | -7.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIBIX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 1.61 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | 0.25 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.95 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIBIX and LSSAX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RIBIX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison
RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than LSSAX's 4.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | 3.78% | 4.02% | 3.35% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 3.28% | 3.91% | 2.44% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 4.28% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
Drawdowns
RIBIX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and LSSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIBIX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.37% | -16.40% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -2.45% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.98% | -16.40% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -1.53% | -4.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -1.98% | -4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 0.84% | +0.32% |
Volatility
RIBIX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison
RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.24%. This indicates that RIBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIBIX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 1.24% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 2.68% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 4.69% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 5.73% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 4.39% | +0.81% |