RHRX vs. WAMA
RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. RHRX is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RHRX charges 1.36%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
RHRX vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RHRX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- YTD
- 21.71%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 42.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHRX vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 3.83% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between RHRX and WAMA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RHRX vs. WAMA — Risk / Return Rank
RHRX
WAMA
RHRX vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RHRX | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.22 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.33 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RHRX | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 7.30 | -6.77 |
Drawdowns
RHRX vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -1.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RHRX | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.33% | -1.91% | -23.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.96% | -0.37% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | — | — |
Volatility
RHRX vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RHRX | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.18% | 8.80% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 8.80% | +10.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 8.80% | +10.24% |
RHRX vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
RHRX vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither RHRX nor WAMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RHRX and WAMA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.
RHRX and WAMA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for RHRX and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for RHRX and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer