PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RHM.DE (Rheinmetall AG) is a stock, while SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, RHM.DE returned 38.55%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RHM.DE is traded in EUR, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHM.DE achieves a -22.00% return, which is significantly lower than SSLN.L's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RHM.DE has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 38.55%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.88% annualized return.

RHM.DE

1D
-1.18%
1M
7.49%
YTD
-22.00%
6M
-24.77%
1Y
-30.34%
3Y*
70.90%
5Y*
71.68%
10Y*
38.55%

SSLN.L

1D
5.20%
1M
-22.71%
YTD
-4.19%
6M
11.05%
1Y
85.84%
3Y*
38.05%
5Y*
20.11%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG		-22.00%155.27%116.51%56.82%128.13%-1.77%-12.43%35.55%-26.03%68.49%
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC		-4.19%118.25%29.15%-4.21%9.79%-6.09%33.38%19.85%-4.67%-9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between RHM.DE and SSLN.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Rheinmetall AG

iShares Physical Silver ETC

Often compared with RHM.DE:
RHM.DE vs. RNMBYRHM.DE vs. SAABYRHM.DE vs. NVDARHM.DE vs. HAG.DERHM.DE vs. LOM.DERHM.DE vs. RYCEYRHM.DE vs. KBGGY
Often compared with SSLN.L:
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.LSSLN.L vs. SLVPSSLN.L vs. SGLP.LSSLN.L vs. SILG.LSSLN.L vs. ISLN.LSSLN.L vs. HOC.LSSLN.L vs. AG

Return for Risk

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RHM.DE
RHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
SSLN.L
SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RHM.DESSLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.68
1.54

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.77
1.99

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.30

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

2.04

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.53

4.54

-6.07

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHM.DE and SSLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHM.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -77.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHM.DE and SSLN.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RHM.DESSLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.51%

-77.65%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.11%

-41.88%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.11%

-41.88%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.11%

-41.88%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.18%

-42.00%

-20.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.77%

-38.86%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.20%

-58.14%

+36.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.80%

18.84%

+0.96%

Volatility

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) is 11.36%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 14.60%. This indicates that RHM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RHM.DESSLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

14.60%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.58%

52.55%

-18.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.66%

55.32%

-10.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.96%

36.78%

+5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.77%

31.04%

+6.73%

Dividends

RHM.DE vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison

RHM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG		0.95%0.52%0.93%1.50%1.77%2.41%2.77%2.05%2.20%1.37%1.72%0.49%
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RHM.DE and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHM.DE and SSLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer