PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RHM.DE vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RHM.DE vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RHM.DE is traded in EUR, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHM.DE achieves a -37.18% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RHM.DE has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 35.62%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 66.77% annualized return.


RHM.DE

1D
2.57%
1M
-24.93%
YTD
-37.18%
6M
-35.36%
1Y
-44.00%
3Y*
58.38%
5Y*
65.42%
10Y*
35.62%

NVDA

1D
1.04%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
7.76%
6M
7.01%
1Y
27.07%
3Y*
64.05%
5Y*
59.02%
10Y*
66.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHM.DE vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
-37.18%155.27%116.51%56.82%128.13%-1.77%-12.43%35.55%-26.03%68.49%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.76%22.43%189.15%228.85%-47.18%142.35%103.97%80.94%-27.57%59.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RHM.DE and NVDA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2007

0.19

The correlation between RHM.DE and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RHM.DE vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHM.DE
RHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHM.DE vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RHM.DENVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.15

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

1.38

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.01

2.87

-4.87

RHM.DE vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHM.DE and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RHM.DE vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHM.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.51%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHM.DE and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHM.DENVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.51%

-82.97%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.92%

-19.76%

-32.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.92%

-41.46%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.92%

-60.91%

+8.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.18%

-60.91%

-1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.69%

-15.30%

-35.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.29%

-31.90%

+10.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.87%

9.47%

+12.40%

Volatility

RHM.DE vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) has a higher volatility of 22.69% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.81%. This indicates that RHM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHM.DENVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.69%

12.81%

+9.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.03%

26.11%

+12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.47%

35.91%

+11.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.86%

51.19%

-8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.14%

49.99%

-11.85%

Dividends

RHM.DE vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

RHM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
1.18%0.52%0.93%1.50%1.77%2.41%2.77%2.05%2.20%1.37%1.72%0.49%

Financials

RHM.DE vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rheinmetall AG and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. RHM.DE values in EUR, NVDA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


RHM.DE and NVDA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHM.DE and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer