RGTZ vs. MSTZ
RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -85.18% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -28.57% return.
RGTZ
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- -85.18%
- 6M
- -81.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 10.06%
- 1M
- 102.15%
- YTD
- -28.57%
- 6M
- -23.10%
- 1Y
- 138.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | -85.18% | 7.21% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -28.57% | 255.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTZ and MSTZ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
RGTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTZ
RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -99.38% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -84.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.04% | -97.57% | +6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -94.45% | +49.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 42.87% | — |
Volatility
RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 42.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 127.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.33% | 143.71% | +74.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 218.33% | 169.81% | +48.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 218.33% | 169.81% | +48.52% |
RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither RGTZ nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTZ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.
RGTZ and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.
Find the right allocation for RGTZ and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer