RGTZ vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -71.32% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -27.52% return.

RGTZ

• 1D: 15.05%
• 1M: 78.63%
• 6M: -61.22%
• YTD: -71.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 38.88%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -27.52%
• 1Y: 299.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF	-71.32%	7.21%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.52%	255.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTZ and MSTZ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

RGTZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTZ	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.49	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.84	—

Drawdowns

RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTZ	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.92%	-99.38%	+6.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-84.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.67%	-97.53%	+14.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.11%	-94.55%	+46.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	43.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTZ	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	55.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	134.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	213.69%	148.58%	+65.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	213.69%	170.73%	+42.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	213.69%	170.73%	+42.96%

RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGTZ nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTZ and MSTZ in my portfolio?

RGTZ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTZ or MSTZ?

On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTZ or MSTZ?

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTZ or MSTZ?

RGTZ and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RGTZ and MSTZ?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.