PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTZ vs. LMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTZ vs. LMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -85.18% return, which is significantly lower than LMNX's -55.70% return.


RGTZ

1D
1.25%
1M
16.13%
YTD
-85.18%
6M
-81.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LMNX

1D
1.73%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-55.70%
6M
-64.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTZ vs. LMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGTZ and LMNX is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025

-0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTZ vs. LMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTZ vs. LMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTZ vs. LMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than LMNX's maximum drawdown of -79.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and LMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTZLMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.92%

-79.62%

-13.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.04%

-74.61%

-16.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.54%

-43.60%

-0.94%

Volatility

RGTZ vs. LMNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTZLMNXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

218.33%

169.75%

+48.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.33%

169.75%

+48.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

218.33%

169.75%

+48.58%

RGTZ vs. LMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than LMNX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTZ vs. LMNX - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGTZ nor LMNX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTZ and LMNX have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RGTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RGTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LMNX.

RGTZ and LMNX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

RGTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while LMNX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 1.31% for LMNX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTZ and LMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer