RGTZ vs. CRSH
RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance ETFs, while CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
RGTZ vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -85.36% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 5.92% return.
RGTZ
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- -85.36%
- 6M
- -79.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 5.92%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- -17.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTZ vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | -85.36% | 7.21% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 5.92% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTZ and CRSH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTZ vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
RGTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRSH
RGTZ vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTZ | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTZ vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTZ | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -63.68% | -29.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.15% | -58.33% | -32.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.28% | -43.37% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.65% | — |
Volatility
RGTZ vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTZ | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.95% | 36.01% | +182.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 218.95% | 47.20% | +171.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 218.95% | 47.20% | +171.75% |
RGTZ vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTZ vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
RGTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 87.09% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTZ and CRSH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 87.09%, compared with 0.00% for RGTZ.
RGTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CRSH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 0.99% for CRSH.
Find the right allocation for RGTZ and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer