RGTU vs. HDV
RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. RGTU is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTU returned -70.28% vs 24.30% for HDV. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
RGTU vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -70.92% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 19.66% return.
RGTU
- 1D
- -7.80%
- 1M
- -20.70%
- 6M
- -47.62%
- YTD
- -70.92%
- 1Y
- -70.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -41.16%
HDV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.70M | $171.89M | $116.16M | |
| $1.54M | $1.48M | $6.02M |
RGTU vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -70.92% | 90.43% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 19.66% | 6.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTU and HDV is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTU vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
RGTU
HDV
RGTU vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.40 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 4.71 | -5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 12.85 | -13.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTU vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -97.93%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.93% | -37.04% | -60.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.93% | -5.18% | -92.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.75% | -1.72% | -95.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.14% | -3.06% | -64.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 80.34% | 1.90% | +78.44% |
Volatility
RGTU vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) has a higher volatility of 56.95% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 4.12%. This indicates that RGTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 56.95% | 4.12% | +52.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 143.89% | 8.54% | +135.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 213.13% | 10.80% | +202.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 215.70% | 12.94% | +202.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 215.70% | 15.78% | +199.92% |
RGTU vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTU vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.95%, more than HDV's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.08% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 70.95% | 20.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTU and HDV have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTU has higher volatility (56.95%) compared to HDV (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTU dropped -97.93% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 1-year performance, HDV leads with 24.30% vs -70.28% for RGTU. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HDV has performed better with a 24.30% return vs -70.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 70.95%, compared with 3.08% for HDV.
RGTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTU and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer