PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIOS vs. CDNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIOS vs. CDNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AIOS Tech, Inc. (AIOS) and CareDx, Inc (CDNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIOS achieves a -45.51% return, which is significantly lower than CDNA's 32.96% return.


AIOS

1D
-13.31%
1M
-27.40%
YTD
-45.51%
6M
-59.23%
1Y
-82.67%
3Y*
-46.37%
5Y*
-64.97%
10Y*

CDNA

1D
-4.32%
1M
15.81%
YTD
32.96%
6M
25.12%
1Y
31.57%
3Y*
47.04%
5Y*
-23.19%
10Y*
18.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIOS vs. CDNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIOS
AIOS Tech, Inc.
-45.51%-84.05%67.75%-29.78%-82.26%-82.37%213.97%584.53%-67.78%-46.87%
CDNA
CareDx, Inc
32.96%-12.00%78.42%5.17%-74.91%-37.23%235.88%-14.20%242.51%171.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AIOS and CDNA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2016

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIOS:

$2.70M

CDNA:

$1.33B

EPS

AIOS:

-$955.63

CDNA:

-$0.15

PS Ratio

AIOS:

0.01

CDNA:

3.22

PB Ratio

AIOS:

0.58

CDNA:

4.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIOS:

$344.69M

CDNA:

$412.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIOS:

$33.75M

CDNA:

$198.97M

EBITDA (TTM)

AIOS:

$9.69M

CDNA:

$4.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIOS vs. CDNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIOS
AIOS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AIOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIOS Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AIOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIOS Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNA
CDNA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIOS vs. CDNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AIOS Tech, Inc. (AIOS) and CareDx, Inc (CDNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIOSCDNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.17

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

0.72

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

1.50

-2.89

AIOS vs. CDNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIOS Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the CDNA Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIOS and CDNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIOS vs. CDNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIOS drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than CDNA's maximum drawdown of -94.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIOS and CDNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIOSCDNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-94.87%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.43%

-43.92%

-47.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.13%

-65.96%

-32.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.76%

-94.85%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.76%

-73.80%

-25.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.24%

-53.75%

-20.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.53%

21.10%

+38.43%

Volatility

AIOS vs. CDNA - Volatility Comparison

AIOS Tech, Inc. (AIOS) has a higher volatility of 40.60% compared to CareDx, Inc (CDNA) at 16.23%. This indicates that AIOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIOSCDNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.60%

16.23%

+24.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

161.43%

45.88%

+115.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

186.76%

72.34%

+114.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.95%

77.50%

+49.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.05%

78.19%

+34.86%

Dividends

AIOS vs. CDNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIOS nor CDNA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AIOS vs. CDNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AIOS Tech, Inc. and CareDx, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M202120222023202420252026
-85.83M
117.70M
(AIOS) Total Revenue
(CDNA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AIOS and CDNA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIOS has higher volatility (40.60%) compared to CDNA (16.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIOS dropped -99.84% vs CDNA's -94.87%.

CDNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIOS and CDNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer