RGR vs. AAPL
RGR (Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. RGR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, RGR returned -2.27%/yr vs 29.23%/yr for AAPL. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RGR vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RGR having a 14.40% return and AAPL slightly lower at 13.84%. Over the past 10 years, RGR has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -2.27%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.23% annualized return.
RGR
- 1D
- -4.84%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 18.34%
- 3Y*
- -9.65%
- 5Y*
- -9.17%
- 10Y*
- -2.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.87%
AAPL
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 16.79%
- 10Y*
- 29.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | $19.18B | $17.68B | $17.20B |
| $4.52M | $3.94M | $5.14M |
RGR vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 14.40% | -6.13% | -20.91% | -8.04% | -15.41% | 9.30% | 50.28% | -10.14% | -2.84% | 8.65% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 13.84% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGR and AAPL is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 1993 | 0.19 |
The correlation between RGR and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RGR:
$593.91M
AAPL:
$4.54T
RGR:
$0.74
AAPL:
$8.69
RGR:
49.98
AAPL:
35.54
RGR:
1.05
AAPL:
9.82
RGR:
2.09
AAPL:
42.38
RGR:
$577.24M
AAPL:
$466.82B
RGR:
$107.93M
AAPL:
$227.12B
RGR:
$27.85M
AAPL:
$168.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGR vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
RGR
AAPL
RGR vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGR | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 3.60 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.54 | 8.56 | -8.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGR vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGR drawdown since its inception was -79.69%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGR and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGR | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.69% | -81.80% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.79% | -13.80% | -24.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.00% | -33.36% | -12.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.22% | -33.36% | -23.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.59% | -38.52% | -22.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.90% | -9.17% | -39.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.02% | -29.52% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.48% | 5.79% | +12.69% |
Volatility
RGR vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) is 8.17%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 11.52%. This indicates that RGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGR | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | 11.52% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.65% | 20.71% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.42% | 25.91% | +10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.44% | 28.02% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 29.12% | +3.86% |
Dividends
RGR vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
RGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 1.05% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 14.66% | 4.94% | 10.00% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 1.85% |
Financials
RGR vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGR vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
RGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 33.74M and revenue of 158.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.77B and revenue of 109.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
RGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.63M and revenue of 158.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.70B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.
RGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 6.98M and revenue of 158.06M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.79B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGR and AAPL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to RGR (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGR dropped -79.69% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGR and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer