RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO).
RGPM.NEO and ZJG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RGPM.NEO is an actively managed fund by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Mar 8, 2023. ZJG.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones North America Select Junior Gold Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010.
Performance
RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | 12.94% | 143.89% | 36.75% | -3.95% |
ZJG.TO BMO Junior Gold Index ETF | 15.25% | 166.86% | 25.66% | 6.50% |
Different Trading Currencies
RGPM.NEO is traded in USD, while ZJG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZJG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGPM.NEO achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than ZJG.TO's 15.25% return.
RGPM.NEO
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- -15.14%
- YTD
- 12.94%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 103.20%
- 3Y*
- 48.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZJG.TO
- 1D
- 4.09%
- 1M
- -18.93%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 32.03%
- 1Y
- 137.63%
- 3Y*
- 54.02%
- 5Y*
- 30.06%
- 10Y*
- 20.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGPM.NEO has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ZJG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RGPM.NEO
ZJG.TO
RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGPM.NEO | ZJG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.92 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 2.97 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 4.22 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.92 | 14.91 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGPM.NEO | ZJG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.92 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 0.14 | +1.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGPM.NEO and ZJG.TO is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO - Dividend Comparison
RGPM.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZJG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZJG.TO BMO Junior Gold Index ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.83% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGPM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum ZJG.TO drawdown of -87.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGPM.NEO and ZJG.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGPM.NEO | ZJG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.46% | -81.59% | +52.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.46% | -32.02% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.14% | -17.70% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -49.37% | +41.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.89% | 9.03% | -1.14% |
Volatility
RGPM.NEO vs. ZJG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) is 16.12%, while BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) has a volatility of 18.22%. This indicates that RGPM.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZJG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGPM.NEO | ZJG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.12% | 18.22% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.40% | 40.46% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.71% | 47.51% | -4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.86% | 38.09% | -6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.86% | 40.54% | -8.68% |