PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZJG.TO is traded in CAD, while SGDJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SGDJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZJG.TO achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than SGDJ's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ZJG.TO has outperformed SGDJ with an annualized return of 16.00%, while SGDJ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.74% annualized return.


ZJG.TO

1D
1.65%
1M
2.45%
YTD
3.21%
6M
9.69%
1Y
73.05%
3Y*
51.42%
5Y*
27.40%
10Y*
16.00%

SGDJ

1D
0.47%
1M
1.91%
YTD
3.75%
6M
11.37%
1Y
82.29%
3Y*
51.41%
5Y*
20.64%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZJG.TO
BMO Junior Gold Index ETF
3.21%154.66%36.44%6.11%-0.89%-16.72%24.40%42.01%-18.76%11.85%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
3.75%161.85%29.60%4.31%-22.44%-15.88%45.41%30.26%-19.32%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ZJG.TO and SGDJ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015

0.84

The correlation between ZJG.TO and SGDJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (3 years) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZJG.TO
SGDJ

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

ZJG.TO
100.0%
SGDJ
100.0%

Communication Services

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Consumer Defensive

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Energy

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Financial Services

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Healthcare

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Industrials

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Real Estate

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Technology

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Utilities

ZJG.TO

-

SGDJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZJG.TO
ZJG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ZJG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZJG.TOSGDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.57

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

6.72

-1.09

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZJG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZJG.TO and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZJG.TOSGDJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.76

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.55

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.33

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.40

-0.23

Drawdowns

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJG.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.59%, which is greater than SGDJ's maximum drawdown of -56.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJG.TO and SGDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZJG.TOSGDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.59%

-56.84%

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.02%

-32.13%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.02%

-32.13%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.63%

-48.86%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.58%

-56.84%

+8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.16%

-23.89%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.08%

-24.49%

-24.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.03%

12.29%

+0.74%

Volatility

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.98% compared to Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) at 12.89%. This indicates that ZJG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZJG.TOSGDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.98%

12.89%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.88%

38.60%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.27%

46.94%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.27%

37.46%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.99%

38.46%

-0.47%

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZJG.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZJG.TO vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

ZJG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SGDJ's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.18%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%
ZJG.TO
BMO Junior Gold Index ETF
0.11%0.12%0.68%0.90%0.83%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZJG.TO and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZJG.TO.

ZJG.TO is categorized as Precious Metals, while SGDJ is Materials. ZJG.TO tracks Dow Jones North America Select Junior Gold Index, while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZJG.TO and 0.50% for SGDJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZJG.TO and SGDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer