RGLO vs. POW

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

RGLO (Russell Investments Global Equity ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGLO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Russell, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

RGLO vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLO achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.

RGLO

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.62%
• 6M: 8.60%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 1Y: 24.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -7.03%
• 6M: 34.18%
• YTD: 41.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGLO vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	10.75%	1.84%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	41.57%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLO and POW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.67

Return for Risk

RGLO vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGLO

RGLO Risk / Return Rank: 70
RGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGLO vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGLO	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	—	—

Drawdowns

RGLO vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLO drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLO and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGLO	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-18.37%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-16.82%	+16.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.21%	-4.40%	+3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGLO	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.26%	32.91%	-19.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.95%	32.91%	-19.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.95%	32.91%	-19.96%

RGLO vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGLO vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

RGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	0.57%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGLO and POW in my portfolio?

RGLO and POW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGLO or POW?

On fees, RGLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGLO or POW?

RGLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGLO or POW?

RGLO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between RGLO and POW?

RGLO is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Russell and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RGLO and 0.75% for POW.