PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGA vs. NVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGA vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGA achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than NVT's 58.14% return.


RGA

1D
0.29%
1M
12.35%
6M
15.97%
YTD
14.83%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
11.40%

NVT

1D
1.69%
1M
-2.31%
6M
53.03%
YTD
58.14%
1Y
116.38%
3Y*
47.35%
5Y*
40.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGA vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RGA
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
14.83%-2.97%34.38%16.39%33.04%-3.21%-27.02%18.29%-5.03%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
58.14%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RGA and NVT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between RGA and NVT has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGA:

$15.14B

NVT:

$25.99B

EPS

RGA:

$20.15

NVT:

$2.99

PE Ratio

RGA:

11.47

NVT:

53.67

PEG Ratio

RGA:

0.43

NVT:

1.29

PS Ratio

RGA:

0.57

NVT:

6.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGA:

$18.13B

NVT:

$4.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGA:

$3.15B

NVT:

$1.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGA:

$1.46B

NVT:

$857.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGA vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGA
RGA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGA vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGANVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.41

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

6.74

-5.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

20.34

-16.55

RGA vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGA Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGA and NVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGA vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGA drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGA and NVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGANVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.75%

-56.18%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.68%

-17.46%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.11%

-46.67%

+19.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.11%

-46.67%

+19.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.81%

+12.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-11.80%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

5.77%

-0.47%

Volatility

RGA vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) is 6.22%, while nVent Electric plc (NVT) has a volatility of 17.61%. This indicates that RGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGANVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

17.61%

-11.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

33.72%

-16.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.85%

43.68%

-19.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.67%

36.58%

-8.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.90%

38.71%

-5.81%

Dividends

RGA vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than NVT's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.51%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RGA
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
1.80%1.79%1.63%2.04%2.15%2.61%2.42%1.59%1.57%1.17%1.24%1.64%

Financials

RGA vs. NVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
6.49M
1.24B
(RGA) Total Revenue
(NVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RGA vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
35.9%
Portfolio components
RGA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

RGA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

RGA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGA and NVT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVT has higher volatility (17.61%) compared to RGA (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGA dropped -65.75% vs NVT's -56.18%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGA and NVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer