RGA vs. MU
RGA (Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. RGA operates in Insurance - Reinsurance (Financial Services), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, RGA returned 11.32%/yr vs 51.33%/yr for MU. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RGA vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGA achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RGA has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 11.32%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 51.33% annualized return.
RGA
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B | |
| $80.43M | $84.29M | $82.13M |
RGA vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 17.66% | -2.97% | 34.38% | 16.39% | 33.04% | -3.21% | -27.02% | 18.29% | -8.71% | 25.59% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGA and MU is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2008 | 0.32 |
The correlation between RGA and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RGA:
$15.52B
MU:
$929.52B
RGA:
$20.15
MU:
$44.42
RGA:
11.76
MU:
18.53
RGA:
0.45
MU:
0.07
RGA:
0.58
MU:
10.36
RGA:
$18.13B
MU:
$90.27B
RGA:
$3.15B
MU:
$65.51B
RGA:
$1.46B
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGA vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
RGA
MU
RGA vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGA | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.63 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 16.92 | -14.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 64.08 | -59.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGA vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGA drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGA and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGA | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.75% | -98.25% | +32.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.68% | -39.10% | +26.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.11% | -57.63% | +30.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.11% | -57.63% | +30.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.75% | -57.63% | -8.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -32.17% | +29.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -58.02% | +46.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.16% | 10.31% | -5.15% |
Volatility
RGA vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) is 7.02%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that RGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGA | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 31.11% | -24.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.74% | 67.64% | -49.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.88% | 81.13% | -57.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 56.32% | -28.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.92% | 51.42% | -18.50% |
Dividends
RGA vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.63% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.64% |
Financials
RGA vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGA vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
RGA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
RGA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
RGA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGA and MU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to RGA (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGA dropped -65.75% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGA and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer