PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFM vs. HIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RFM vs. HIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RFM vs. HIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
2.29%1.59%3.24%6.50%-22.85%10.85%15.33%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
-0.45%4.69%6.23%7.89%-12.36%5.60%9.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFM achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than HIMFX's -0.45% return.


RFM

1D
2.04%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
2.29%
6M
0.79%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
-1.10%
10Y*

HIMFX

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFM vs. HIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFM has a 5.15% expense ratio, which is higher than HIMFX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RFM vs. HIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFM
RFM Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
RFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFM Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFM Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFM vs. HIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFMHIMFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.25

0.72

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.39

0.97

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.21

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

0.87

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.69

2.64

-1.95

RFM vs. HIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFM Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the HIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFM and HIMFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFMHIMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

0.72

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.36

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.80

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between RFM and HIMFX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RFM vs. HIMFX - Dividend Comparison

RFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than HIMFX's 4.00% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
7.91%8.07%7.70%7.64%8.38%10.49%5.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
4.00%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%

Drawdowns

RFM vs. HIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFM drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than HIMFX's maximum drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFM and HIMFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RFMHIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-17.57%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-5.60%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.49%

-17.57%

-17.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.02%

-2.70%

-13.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.77%

-3.21%

-11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

1.85%

+1.51%

Volatility

RFM vs. HIMFX - Volatility Comparison

RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) at 1.08%. This indicates that RFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RFMHIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

1.08%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

1.87%

+5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

6.36%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.85%

4.78%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.75%

4.62%

+8.13%