PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFM vs. RMMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFM vs. RMMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) and RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc. (RMMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFM achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than RMMZ's 6.45% return.


RFM

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.35%
6M
9.06%
YTD
10.70%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
-1.76%
10Y*

RMMZ

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.87%
6M
5.37%
YTD
6.45%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFM vs. RMMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
10.70%1.59%3.24%6.50%-17.11%
RMMZ
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc.
6.45%4.99%2.72%11.22%-18.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RFM and RMMZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022

0.42

The correlation between RFM and RMMZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFM vs. RMMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFM
RFM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

RMMZ
RMMZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RMMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RMMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFM vs. RMMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) and RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc. (RMMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFMRMMZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.47

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

8.07

+0.05

RFM vs. RMMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the RMMZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFM and RMMZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFM vs. RMMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFM drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than RMMZ's maximum drawdown of -27.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFM and RMMZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFMRMMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-27.15%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-5.58%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-18.30%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.12%

-1.00%

-8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.65%

-9.47%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.71%

+0.14%

Volatility

RFM vs. RMMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) is 1.47%, while RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc. (RMMZ) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that RFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFMRMMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

2.08%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

7.03%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.42%

9.94%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

17.53%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

17.53%

-4.90%

Dividends

RFM vs. RMMZ - Dividend Comparison

RFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, less than RMMZ's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
7.33%8.07%7.70%7.64%8.38%10.49%5.07%
RMMZ
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc.
7.41%7.86%7.82%7.45%6.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFM and RMMZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMMZ has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to RFM (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFM dropped -35.49% vs RMMZ's -27.15%.

RFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFM and RMMZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer