PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFM vs. TMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFM vs. TMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFM achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than TMNIX's 1.65% return.


RFM

1D
0.41%
1M
2.36%
YTD
8.40%
6M
7.36%
1Y
13.26%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
-1.66%
10Y*

TMNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.98%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.93%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFM vs. TMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
8.40%1.59%3.24%6.50%-22.85%10.85%15.33%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
1.65%2.56%3.92%6.85%-3.12%2.96%6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RFM and TMNIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFM vs. TMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFM
RFM Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFM Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

TMNIX
TMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFM vs. TMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFMTMNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.63

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.69

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.16

7.43

-0.27

RFM vs. TMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the TMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFM and TMNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFM vs. TMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFM drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than TMNIX's maximum drawdown of -4.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFM and TMNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFMTMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-4.63%

-30.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-2.26%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-4.61%

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.49%

-4.63%

-30.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.01%

-0.33%

-10.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-1.47%

-13.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

0.82%

+1.04%

Volatility

RFM vs. TMNIX - Volatility Comparison

RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) at 0.75%. This indicates that RFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFMTMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

0.75%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

1.97%

+5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

2.54%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.85%

3.04%

+9.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

2.68%

+10.00%

RFM vs. TMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFM has a 5.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TMNIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFM vs. TMNIX - Dividend Comparison

RFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than TMNIX's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
7.48%8.07%7.70%7.64%8.38%10.49%5.07%0.00%0.00%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
3.12%2.79%3.31%3.40%0.36%4.39%2.36%3.69%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFM and TMNIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFM has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to TMNIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFM dropped -35.49% vs TMNIX's -4.63%.

TMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFM and TMNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer