PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMFX vs. CGHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMFX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than CGHM's 0.35% return.


HIMFX

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*

CGHM

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
0.35%
6M
2.28%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIMFX vs. CGHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMFX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than CGHM's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIMFX vs. CGHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIMFXCGHMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

1.00

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

1.25

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.03

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.64

2.98

-0.34

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the CGHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMFX and CGHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIMFXCGHMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.00

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.94

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between HIMFX and CGHM is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Dividend Comparison

HIMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than CGHM's 3.76% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
4.00%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.76%3.61%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.57%, which is greater than CGHM's maximum drawdown of -5.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMFX and CGHM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMFXCGHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.57%

-5.90%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.60%

-4.98%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-1.93%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-1.30%

-1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.72%

+0.13%

Volatility

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) is 1.08%, while Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that HIMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIMFXCGHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.55%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

2.13%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.36%

4.97%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.78%

4.65%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.62%

4.65%

-0.03%