PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMFX vs. CGHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMFX achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than CGHM's 3.08% return.


HIMFX

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.80%
YTD
2.51%
6M
3.09%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*

CGHM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.86%
YTD
3.08%
6M
3.34%
1Y
8.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HIMFX and CGHM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024

0.75

The correlation between HIMFX and CGHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMFX vs. CGHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIMFXCGHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.65

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.50

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.88

13.55

-2.67

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the CGHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMFX and CGHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.57%, which is greater than CGHM's maximum drawdown of -5.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMFX and CGHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMFXCGHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.57%

-5.90%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.55%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.04%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-1.21%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.66%

+0.11%

Volatility

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Volatility Comparison

American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) at 0.74%. This indicates that HIMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMFXCGHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.74%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

2.23%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

3.11%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

4.47%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

4.47%

+0.12%

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMFX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than CGHM's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMFX vs. CGHM - Dividend Comparison

HIMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than CGHM's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.79%3.61%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
4.22%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIMFX and CGHM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMFX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to CGHM (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMFX dropped -17.57% vs CGHM's -5.90%.

CGHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMFX and CGHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer