PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFG vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFG vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFG achieves a 22.14% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RFG has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 10.49%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


RFG

1D
0.61%
1M
7.30%
YTD
22.14%
6M
21.89%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
10.49%

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFG vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
22.14%8.80%17.80%16.42%-21.70%13.81%32.86%17.09%-13.98%20.46%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RFG and SPHD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between RFG and SPHD has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFG vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFG
SPHD

Industrials

31.3%
0.0%

Technology

21.2%
1.5%

Healthcare

19.4%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
3.4%

Energy

5.4%
14.1%

Financial Services

3.7%
15.6%

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
17.8%

Utilities

2.4%
13.7%

Real Estate

2.2%
20.1%

Communication Services

0.6%
8.6%

Industrials

RFG
31.3%
SPHD
0.0%

Technology

RFG
21.2%
SPHD
1.5%

Healthcare

RFG
19.4%
SPHD
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RFG
7.6%
SPHD
3.4%

Energy

RFG
5.4%
SPHD
14.1%

Financial Services

RFG
3.7%
SPHD
15.6%

Basic Materials

RFG
3.3%
SPHD

-

Consumer Defensive

RFG
3.1%
SPHD
17.8%

Utilities

RFG
2.4%
SPHD
13.7%

Real Estate

RFG
2.2%
SPHD
20.1%

Communication Services

RFG
0.6%
SPHD
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFG vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFG
RFG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFG vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFGSPHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

0.74

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

1.15

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.13

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.11

+2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.89

2.78

+10.11

RFG vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFG and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFGSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.74

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.39

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.40

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.58

-0.15

Drawdowns

RFG vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFG drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFG and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFGSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.93%

-41.39%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.41%

-7.33%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.71%

-13.29%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.16%

-19.50%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.92%

-41.39%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.37%

+5.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-4.70%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.93%

-0.37%

Volatility

RFG vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that RFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFGSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

2.99%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

7.55%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

11.04%

+7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

14.16%

+8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.05%

17.64%

+5.41%

RFG vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFG vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

RFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
0.31%0.43%0.38%0.99%0.78%0.05%0.27%0.64%0.76%0.66%0.35%0.61%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFG and SPHD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFG has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFG dropped -51.93% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, RFG leads with 10.49% vs 7.08% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RFG has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFG.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.31% for RFG.

RFG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SPHD is S&P 500. RFG tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth, while SPHD tracks S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RFG and 0.30% for SPHD.

RFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFG and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer