RFFC vs. THLV
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV).
RFFC and THLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFFC is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. THLV is a passively managed fund by THOR that tracks the performance of the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2022.
Performance
RFFC vs. THLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFFC vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | -0.91% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -1.80% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 6.82% | 10.50% | 9.52% | 5.88% | 2.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 6.82% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
THLV
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 20.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFFC vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
THLV
RFFC vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.79 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.50 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.15 | -1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 11.39 | -3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.79 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.86 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and THLV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFFC vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than THLV's 1.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.81% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and THLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -13.15% | -23.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -6.66% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -4.37% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -3.75% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 1.84% | +0.76% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.55%. This indicates that RFFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.55% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 7.61% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 11.31% | +5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 11.80% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 11.80% | +6.25% |