RFFC vs. BSJO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RFFC (ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF) and BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFFC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SS&C, while BSJO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index. RFFC is actively managed, while BSJO is passively managed. RFFC charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJO.

Performance

RFFC vs. BSJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RFFC

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 10.92%
• 1Y: 29.41%
• 3Y*: 21.13%
• 5Y*: 12.28%
• 10Y*: 12.76%

BSJO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFFC vs. BSJO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF	8.31%
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

RFFC vs. BSJO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFFC

RFFC Risk / Return Rank: 75
RFFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RFFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RFFC Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RFFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
RFFC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

BSJO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFFC vs. BSJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFFC	BSJO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.52	—	—

Drawdowns

RFFC vs. BSJO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than BSJO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and BSJO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFFC	BSJO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.26%	0.00%	-36.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	0.00%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	0.00%	-5.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RFFC	BSJO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.44%	0.00%	+12.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	0.00%	+16.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	0.00%	+18.01%

RFFC vs. BSJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJO's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFFC vs. BSJO - Dividend Comparison

RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF	0.63%	0.78%	1.05%	1.35%	1.41%	0.71%	1.79%	1.34%	1.36%	0.93%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, RFFC or BSJO?

On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFFC or BSJO?

BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for RFFC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFFC or BSJO?

RFFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.

What is the main difference between RFFC and BSJO?

RFFC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BSJO is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RFFC and 0.42% for BSJO.