PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RFFC vs. SDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RFFC vs. SDOG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RFFC (ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF) and SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFFC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SS&C, while SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. RFFC is actively managed, while SDOG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFFC returned 12.66%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for SDOG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFFC charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SDOG.

Performance

RFFC vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than SDOG's 14.96% return. Over the past 10 years, RFFC has outperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 12.66%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.

RFFC

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.61%
YTD
10.13%
6M
9.43%
1Y
27.11%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
12.66%

SDOG

1D
0.47%
1M
1.24%
YTD
14.96%
6M
14.84%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFFC vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFFC
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF		10.13%16.83%23.51%19.50%-14.58%22.33%12.48%24.77%-10.23%21.02%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF		14.96%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RFFC and SDOG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2016

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between RFFC and SDOG has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFFC vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RFFC
SDOG

Technology

33.0%
16.2%

Industrials

12.2%
7.5%

Healthcare

11.7%
9.8%

Financial Services

10.9%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
16.3%

Communication Services

8.7%
8.4%

Energy

4.8%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
9.5%

Utilities

2.4%
9.2%

Basic Materials

2.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

RFFC
33.0%
SDOG
16.2%

Industrials

RFFC
12.2%
SDOG
7.5%

Healthcare

RFFC
11.7%
SDOG
9.8%

Financial Services

RFFC
10.9%
SDOG
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RFFC
9.3%
SDOG
16.3%

Communication Services

RFFC
8.7%
SDOG
8.4%

Energy

RFFC
4.8%
SDOG
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

RFFC
2.7%
SDOG
9.5%

Utilities

RFFC
2.4%
SDOG
9.2%

Basic Materials

RFFC
2.3%
SDOG
3.5%

Real Estate

RFFC
2.0%
SDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF

ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF

Often compared with RFFC:
RFFC vs. BSJORFFC vs. SCHGRFFC vs. LVHIRFFC vs. ONEQRFFC vs. VYMIRFFC vs. TEXNRFFC vs. ACES
Often compared with SDOG:
SDOG vs. SCHDSDOG vs. SPYSDOG vs. CDLSDOG vs. SDYSDOG vs. VOOSDOG vs. VIGSDOG vs. DIVO

Return for Risk

RFFC vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RFFC
RFFC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RFFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFFC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RFFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFFC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFFC vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RFFCSDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.19
2.12

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.06
3.18

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.95

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

12.53

+0.84

RFFC vs. SDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFFC Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the SDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFFC and SDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFFC vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum SDOG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and SDOG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RFFCSDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-43.56%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-6.24%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-16.00%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

-19.84%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-43.56%

+7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.85%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-4.90%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.96%

+0.07%

Volatility

RFFC vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) at 3.71%. This indicates that RFFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RFFCSDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.71%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

8.18%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

11.60%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

15.37%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

19.02%

-1.01%

RFFC vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFFC vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison

RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than SDOG's 3.49% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFFC
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF		0.64%0.78%1.05%1.35%1.41%0.71%1.79%1.34%1.36%0.93%0.66%0.00%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF		3.49%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

RFFC and SDOG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFFC has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to SDOG (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFFC dropped -36.26% vs SDOG's -43.56%.

On 10-year performance, RFFC leads with 12.66% vs 9.96% for SDOG. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RFFC has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for RFFC.

SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.64% for RFFC.

RFFC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RFFC and 0.36% for SDOG.

RFFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFFC and SDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer