RFFC vs. SDOG
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG).
RFFC and SDOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFFC is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. SDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2012.
Performance
RFFC vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFFC vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | -0.91% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 22.33% | 12.48% | 24.77% | -10.23% | 21.02% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 8.59% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than SDOG's 8.59% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 16.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFFC vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SDOG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
SDOG
RFFC vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.48 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.34 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 5.74 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.58 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.63 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and SDOG is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFFC vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than SDOG's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.81% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum SDOG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and SDOG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -43.56% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -13.12% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -19.84% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -3.25% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -4.96% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.08% | -0.48% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) at 3.03%. This indicates that RFFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.03% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 8.43% | +1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 16.14% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 15.48% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 19.09% | -1.04% |