RFFC vs. BFOR
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR).
RFFC and BFOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFFC is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. BFOR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Barron's 400 Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2013.
Performance
RFFC vs. BFOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFFC vs. BFOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | -0.91% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 22.33% | 12.48% | 24.77% | -10.23% | 21.02% |
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.80% | 13.85% | 17.81% | 18.19% | -15.92% | 30.71% | 17.60% | 21.30% | -13.86% | 19.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than BFOR's 0.80% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BFOR
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFFC vs. BFOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. BFOR — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
BFOR
RFFC vs. BFOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.02 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.55 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.63 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 6.88 | +1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.02 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.46 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and BFOR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFFC vs. BFOR - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than BFOR's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.81% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.59% | 0.60% | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. BFOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum BFOR drawdown of -41.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and BFOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -41.27% | +5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -12.75% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -25.93% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -6.79% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -6.49% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.02% | -0.42% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. BFOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) is 5.35%, while ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that RFFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 5.74% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 11.41% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 19.99% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 19.44% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 20.41% | -2.36% |