PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFEU vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFEU vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEU achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RFEU has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 7.29%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.


RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
6M
4.04%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
7.29%

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEU vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%26.58%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEU and FDL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016

0.50

The correlation between RFEU and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.50 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RFEU vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFEU
FDL

Financial Services

18.9%
15.1%

Industrials

15.4%
3.8%

Healthcare

13.3%
16.8%

Technology

12.5%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
14.7%

Energy

8.7%
27.3%

Utilities

6.4%
6.5%

Communication Services

3.8%
10.6%

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

RFEU
18.9%
FDL
15.1%

Industrials

RFEU
15.4%
FDL
3.8%

Healthcare

RFEU
13.3%
FDL
16.8%

Technology

RFEU
12.5%
FDL
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RFEU
10.6%
FDL
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

RFEU
9.3%
FDL
14.7%

Energy

RFEU
8.7%
FDL
27.3%

Utilities

RFEU
6.4%
FDL
6.5%

Communication Services

RFEU
3.8%
FDL
10.6%

Basic Materials

RFEU
1.2%
FDL
0.3%

Real Estate

RFEU

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFEU vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEU vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFEUFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

5.56

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

13.56

-2.63

RFEU vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEU and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFEUFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.11

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.88

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.66

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.45

-0.04

Drawdowns

RFEU vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEU drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEU and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFEUFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-65.93%

+26.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-4.27%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-12.24%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.92%

-16.46%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

-41.40%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-2.18%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-9.66%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.75%

-0.40%

Volatility

RFEU vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) is 0.00%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that RFEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFEUFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

2.85%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

7.87%

-3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

11.28%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

14.31%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

17.11%

+0.75%

RFEU vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEU has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFEU vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

RFEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
2.83%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFEU and FDL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEU dropped -39.74% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.24% vs 7.29% for RFEU. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.83% for RFEU.

RFEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFEU and 0.45% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFEU and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer