RFEM vs. RNEM

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

RFEM (First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF) and RNEM (First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from First Trust. RFEM is actively managed, while RNEM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RFEM returned 9.59%/yr vs 5.12%/yr for RNEM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFEM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNEM.

Performance

RFEM vs. RNEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a 20.69% return, which is significantly higher than RNEM's 1.72% return.

RFEM

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 17.22%
• YTD: 20.69%
• 1Y: 35.70%
• 3Y*: 23.15%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

RNEM

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.30%
• 6M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 1Y: 4.10%
• 3Y*: 7.59%
• 5Y*: 5.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEM vs. RNEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF	20.69%	27.71%	10.85%	20.78%	-19.05%	0.97%	8.19%	20.33%	-18.80%	15.14%
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	1.72%	15.58%	-1.47%	23.43%	-8.75%	6.16%	-8.16%	12.76%	-9.34%	11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEM and RNEM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017	0.71

The correlation between RFEM and RNEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFEM vs. RNEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RFEM	RNEM
Technology	36.3%	6.4%
Financial Services	21.0%	35.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	9.9%
Industrials	8.0%	3.9%
Energy	5.9%	7.0%
Communication Services	5.0%	8.7%
Basic Materials	3.9%	14.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	6.0%
Healthcare	2.4%	4.5%
Utilities	1.3%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.8%

Return for Risk

RFEM vs. RNEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEM

RFEM Risk / Return Rank: 76
RFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
RFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

RNEM

RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 13
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEM vs. RNEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFEM	RNEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	0.24	+1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	0.44	+2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.05	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	0.28	+2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.53	0.76	+10.77

RFEM vs. RNEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the RNEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEM and RNEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFEM vs. RNEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, which is greater than RNEM's maximum drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and RNEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFEM	RNEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.22%	-38.38%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.65%	-10.71%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	-13.09%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.30%	-21.41%	-11.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-4.43%	+2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.89%	-9.26%	-2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	3.98%	-0.89%

Volatility

RFEM vs. RNEM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) at 3.37%. This indicates that RFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFEM	RNEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	3.37%	+3.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.18%	10.85%	+5.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.31%	12.45%	+5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.16%	14.46%	+3.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.70%	17.18%	+2.52%

RFEM vs. RNEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RNEM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFEM vs. RNEM - Dividend Comparison

RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than RNEM's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF	2.62%	1.98%	3.64%	3.28%	7.74%	3.21%	1.22%	3.75%	2.37%	1.62%	3.73%
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	2.33%	2.75%	3.45%	1.63%	2.99%	3.20%	3.01%	2.85%	2.85%	2.28%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFEM and RNEM in my portfolio?

RFEM and RNEM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFEM or RNEM?

RFEM has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to RNEM (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEM dropped -42.22% vs RNEM's -38.38%.

Which ETF is better, RFEM or RNEM?

On 5-year performance, RFEM leads with 9.59% vs 5.12% for RNEM. On fees, RNEM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFEM or RNEM?

Over the 5-year period, RFEM has performed better with a 9.59% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFEM or RNEM?

RNEM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RFEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFEM or RNEM?

RFEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.33% for RNEM.

What is the main difference between RFEM and RNEM?

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RFEM and 0.75% for RNEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.