PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFDI vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFDI vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDI achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 68.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RFDI has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 9.15%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.


RFDI

1D
0.14%
1M
4.03%
6M
7.50%
YTD
15.09%
1Y
31.09%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.15%
ALL TIME*
9.05%

BNO

1D
-5.06%
1M
20.57%
6M
52.91%
YTD
68.89%
1Y
54.59%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
21.29%
10Y*
13.80%
ALL TIME*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$109.23M$101.30M$143.17M
$615.45K$498.53K$409.01K

RFDI vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
15.09%35.95%5.56%18.14%-23.57%17.36%9.16%20.47%-18.26%24.08%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
68.89%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDI and BNO is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2016

0.20

The correlation between RFDI and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFDI vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RFDI
RFDI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RFDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RFDI vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFDIBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.59

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

4.81

+6.40

RFDI vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDI and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFDI vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDI drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDI and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFDIBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-87.06%

+47.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-34.46%

+24.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-34.46%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

-34.46%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.40%

-75.18%

+35.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.46%

+20.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-39.99%

+30.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

11.41%

-8.63%

Volatility

RFDI vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) is 3.98%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 18.59%. This indicates that RFDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFDIBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

18.59%

-14.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

41.33%

-28.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

44.80%

-29.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

36.47%

-19.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

37.01%

-19.98%

RFDI vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDI has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFDI vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

RFDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
3.07%3.45%5.21%2.43%5.00%3.22%1.34%2.72%2.59%1.63%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFDI and BNO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (18.59%) compared to RFDI (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDI dropped -39.40% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.80% vs 9.15% for RFDI. On fees, RFDI is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, RFDI has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.80% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RFDI is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

RFDI has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

RFDI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFDI and 1.00% for BNO.

RFDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFDI and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer