RFDA vs. EQL
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL).
RFDA and EQL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFDA is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. EQL is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the NYSE Select Sector Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2009.
Performance
RFDA vs. EQL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFDA vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | -1.05% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -9.27% | 19.86% |
EQL Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF | 2.94% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than EQL's 2.94% return.
RFDA
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
EQL
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFDA vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFDA vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank
RFDA
EQL
RFDA vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFDA | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.03 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.50 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.36 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 6.74 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFDA | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.03 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.73 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.83 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFDA and EQL is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFDA vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison
RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than EQL's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.99% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
EQL Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.71% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
RFDA vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, roughly equal to the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and EQL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFDA | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -35.65% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -11.90% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -19.24% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -4.49% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -3.28% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.40% | +0.09% |
Volatility
RFDA vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 3.95%. This indicates that RFDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFDA | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.95% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 7.32% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 14.88% | +2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 14.60% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 16.55% | +0.38% |