EQL vs. SPY
EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQL returned 12.66%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQL charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
EQL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQL having a 8.44% return and SPY slightly lower at 8.15%. Over the past 10 years, EQL has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 12.66%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
EQL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
EQL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 8.44% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQL and SPY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EQL and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQL
SPY
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
EQL
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
EQL
SPY
Real Estate
EQL
SPY
Communication Services
EQL
SPY
Healthcare
EQL
SPY
Consumer Defensive
EQL
SPY
Financial Services
EQL
SPY
Industrials
EQL
SPY
Utilities
EQL
SPY
Energy
EQL
SPY
Basic Materials
EQL
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
EQL
SPY
EQL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.67 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 11.92 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -55.19% | +19.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -8.88% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -18.76% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | -24.50% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | -33.72% | -1.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -3.17% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -9.04% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.98% | -0.38% |
Volatility
EQL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 3.08%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 4.87% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.20% | 9.85% | -2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.59% | 12.50% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 17.15% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 17.95% | -1.41% |
EQL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.63% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQL and SPY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to EQL (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 12.66% for EQL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
EQL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer