PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFDA vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFDA vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 16.31% return.


RFDA

1D
-0.92%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.40%
6M
12.25%
1Y
29.49%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*

AMLP

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
16.31%
6M
14.89%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
16.90%
10Y*
6.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFDA vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
11.40%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%11.26%27.15%-9.27%19.86%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
16.31%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDA and AMLP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between RFDA and AMLP has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFDA vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFDA
AMLP

Technology

19.9%

-

Financial Services

14.7%

-

Energy

12.5%
97.7%

Industrials

8.9%

-

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Communication Services

8.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%

-

Real Estate

5.0%

-

Utilities

5.0%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

RFDA
19.9%
AMLP

-

Financial Services

RFDA
14.7%
AMLP

-

Energy

RFDA
12.5%
AMLP
97.7%

Industrials

RFDA
8.9%
AMLP

-

Healthcare

RFDA
8.8%
AMLP

-

Communication Services

RFDA
8.8%
AMLP

-

Consumer Defensive

RFDA
7.6%
AMLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

RFDA
7.0%
AMLP

-

Real Estate

RFDA
5.0%
AMLP

-

Utilities

RFDA
5.0%
AMLP
2.3%

Basic Materials

RFDA
1.8%
AMLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFDA vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFDA vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFDAAMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.25

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

1.92

+3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.87

6.37

+13.50

RFDA vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDA Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDA and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFDAAMLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.45

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.85

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.22

+0.57

Drawdowns

RFDA vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and AMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFDAAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.60%

-77.19%

+42.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.45%

-8.94%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-14.27%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-20.92%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-4.10%

+3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-17.40%

+13.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.68%

-1.19%

Volatility

RFDA vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is 2.66%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that RFDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFDAAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

4.91%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

8.66%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

11.90%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

19.98%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

27.68%

-10.83%

RFDA vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFDA vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than AMLP's 7.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.64%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.77%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFDA and AMLP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMLP has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to RFDA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDA dropped -34.60% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

On 5-year performance, AMLP leads with 16.90% vs 13.17% for RFDA. On fees, RFDA is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 16.90% return vs 13.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RFDA is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 1.77% for RFDA.

RFDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AMLP is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for RFDA and 0.90% for AMLP.

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFDA and AMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer