RFCYX vs. RLVSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX).
RFCYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Jun 22, 2005. RLVSX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Sep 4, 1985.
Performance
RFCYX vs. RLVSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFCYX vs. RLVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCYX Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund | -0.52% | 7.55% | 1.11% | 4.92% | -14.07% | -1.55% | 8.98% | 9.57% | -0.54% | 4.04% |
RLVSX Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund | 0.09% | 4.26% | 1.76% | 6.11% | -7.58% | 2.03% | 4.05% | 7.38% | 1.45% | 4.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCYX achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than RLVSX's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RFCYX has underperformed RLVSX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while RLVSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.19% annualized return.
RFCYX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
RLVSX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFCYX vs. RLVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCYX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RLVSX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFCYX vs. RLVSX — Risk / Return Rank
RFCYX
RLVSX
RFCYX vs. RLVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFCYX | RLVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.95 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.26 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.35 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.04 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 4.07 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFCYX | RLVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.95 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.39 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.66 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.95 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCYX and RLVSX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RFCYX vs. RLVSX - Dividend Comparison
RFCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than RLVSX's 3.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCYX Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund | 5.21% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.13% | 7.15% | 3.70% | 2.41% | 1.29% | 4.92% | 4.06% |
RLVSX Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund | 3.54% | 3.18% | 3.57% | 3.20% | 2.73% | 2.06% | 2.58% | 3.08% | 2.89% | 2.65% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
Drawdowns
RFCYX vs. RLVSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than RLVSX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCYX and RLVSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCYX | RLVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.34% | -11.77% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.08% | -4.11% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.34% | -11.77% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.34% | -11.77% | -7.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.41% | -1.85% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -1.53% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.05% | -0.04% |
Volatility
RFCYX vs. RLVSX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) at 0.80%. This indicates that RFCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFCYX | RLVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 0.80% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 1.11% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 4.27% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 3.08% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.99% | 3.32% | +1.67% |