PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLVSX vs. RFAYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLVSX vs. RFAYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) and Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLVSX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than RFAYX's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RLVSX has outperformed RFAYX with an annualized return of 2.05%, while RFAYX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.32% annualized return.


RLVSX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.32%
6M
-0.21%
YTD
0.70%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
2.05%
ALL TIME*
2.30%

RFAYX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.89%
6M
-0.55%
YTD
-0.33%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*
1.32%
ALL TIME*
3.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RLVSX vs. RFAYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLVSX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
0.70%4.26%1.76%6.11%-7.58%2.03%4.05%7.38%1.45%4.69%
RFAYX
Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund
-0.33%7.47%1.57%4.85%-14.80%-1.09%9.10%9.03%-0.56%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RLVSX and RFAYX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.52

The correlation between RLVSX and RFAYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (10 years) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLVSX vs. RFAYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RLVSX
RLVSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RLVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RLVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

RFAYX
RFAYX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RFAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RFAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RLVSX vs. RFAYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) and Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLVSXRFAYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.15

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.10

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.19

2.77

+4.42

RLVSX vs. RFAYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLVSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the RFAYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLVSX and RFAYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RLVSX vs. RFAYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLVSX drawdown since its inception was -11.77%, smaller than the maximum RFAYX drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLVSX and RFAYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLVSXRFAYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.77%

-19.61%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-2.73%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.22%

-5.18%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.74%

-19.61%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.77%

-19.61%

+7.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-4.68%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-2.99%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

1.08%

-0.43%

Volatility

RLVSX vs. RFAYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) is 0.75%, while Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) has a volatility of 0.94%. This indicates that RLVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFAYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLVSXRFAYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.94%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.56%

2.74%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

3.54%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.12%

5.90%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.33%

4.91%

-1.58%

RLVSX vs. RFAYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLVSX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than RFAYX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

RLVSX vs. RFAYX - Dividend Comparison

RLVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than RFAYX's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFAYX
Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund
5.52%5.19%4.74%3.71%1.25%2.50%5.27%3.46%2.67%1.57%5.45%4.09%
RLVSX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
3.56%3.18%3.57%3.20%2.73%2.06%2.58%3.08%2.89%2.65%2.64%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLVSX and RFAYX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFAYX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to RLVSX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLVSX dropped -11.77% vs RFAYX's -19.61%.

RLVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLVSX and RFAYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer