PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFCYX vs. REAYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFCYX vs. REAYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFCYX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than REAYX's 11.30% return.


RFCYX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.14%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*
1.69%

REAYX

1D
0.76%
1M
3.32%
YTD
11.30%
6M
12.30%
1Y
23.50%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFCYX vs. REAYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
0.21%7.55%1.11%4.92%-14.07%-1.55%8.98%9.57%-0.54%3.43%
REAYX
Russell Investments Equity Income Fund
11.30%14.66%11.90%12.50%-8.86%27.01%9.06%29.57%-8.60%13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RFCYX and REAYX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017

-0.00

The correlation between RFCYX and REAYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFCYX vs. REAYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFCYX
RFCYX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RFCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RFCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

REAYX
REAYX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
REAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
REAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
REAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
REAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFCYX vs. REAYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFCYXREAYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

2.41

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

3.49

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.68

-1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.52

14.13

-8.61

RFCYX vs. REAYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the REAYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFCYX and REAYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFCYXREAYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.41

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.58

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.62

+0.14

Drawdowns

RFCYX vs. REAYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum REAYX drawdown of -36.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCYX and REAYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFCYXREAYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-36.87%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-6.66%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-20.66%

+14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.34%

-20.66%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

0.00%

-3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-4.93%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.73%

-0.74%

Volatility

RFCYX vs. REAYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) is 1.27%, while Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that RFCYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REAYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFCYXREAYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

2.70%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

7.50%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84%

10.16%

-6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

16.75%

-10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

18.56%

-13.56%

RFCYX vs. REAYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFCYX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than REAYX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFCYX vs. REAYX - Dividend Comparison

RFCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, less than REAYX's 13.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REAYX
Russell Investments Equity Income Fund
13.50%15.24%15.38%13.55%19.72%10.47%3.61%1.86%45.26%14.47%0.00%0.00%
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
5.24%5.18%4.89%2.77%2.77%2.13%7.15%3.70%2.41%1.29%4.92%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFCYX and REAYX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REAYX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to RFCYX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFCYX dropped -19.34% vs REAYX's -36.87%.

REAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFCYX and REAYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer