PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLVSX vs. RSEAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLVSX vs. RSEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) and Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLVSX achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than RSEAX's 9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RLVSX has underperformed RSEAX with an annualized return of 2.25%, while RSEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.


RLVSX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.83%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
2.25%

RSEAX

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.26%
YTD
9.71%
6M
9.63%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
13.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLVSX vs. RSEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLVSX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
1.53%4.26%1.76%6.11%-7.58%2.03%4.05%7.38%1.45%4.69%
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
9.71%14.44%19.90%26.15%-21.05%20.19%23.44%29.58%-9.98%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RLVSX and RSEAX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

-0.03

The correlation between RLVSX and RSEAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLVSX vs. RSEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLVSX
RLVSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RLVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RLVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RSEAX
RSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLVSX vs. RSEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) and Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLVSXRSEAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.38

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.75

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

11.75

-1.69

RLVSX vs. RSEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLVSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the RSEAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLVSX and RSEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLVSXRSEAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

2.14

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.56

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.70

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.70

+0.27

Drawdowns

RLVSX vs. RSEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLVSX drawdown since its inception was -11.77%, smaller than the maximum RSEAX drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLVSX and RSEAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLVSXRSEAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.77%

-34.37%

+22.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-9.19%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.22%

-25.68%

+21.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.77%

-27.52%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.77%

-34.37%

+22.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.16%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-4.91%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

2.15%

-1.54%

Volatility

RLVSX vs. RSEAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) is 0.70%, while Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that RLVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLVSXRSEAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

2.75%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.38%

8.85%

-7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77%

11.80%

-10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.10%

18.47%

-15.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.33%

18.86%

-15.53%

RLVSX vs. RSEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLVSX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than RSEAX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RLVSX vs. RSEAX - Dividend Comparison

RLVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than RSEAX's 10.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLVSX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
3.52%3.18%3.57%3.20%2.73%2.06%2.58%3.08%2.89%2.65%2.64%2.80%
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
10.66%11.81%10.74%4.04%6.61%7.64%0.52%5.07%23.30%9.12%5.47%6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLVSX and RSEAX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSEAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to RLVSX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLVSX dropped -11.77% vs RSEAX's -34.37%.

RLVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLVSX and RSEAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer