RFCYX vs. RGEAX
RFCYX (Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund) and RGEAX (Russell Investments Global Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - RFCYX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Russell, while RGEAX is a Global Equities fund managed by Russell. Over the past 10 years, RFCYX returned 1.68%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for RGEAX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. RFCYX charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for RGEAX.
Performance
RFCYX vs. RGEAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCYX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than RGEAX's 9.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RFCYX has underperformed RGEAX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while RGEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.
RFCYX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
RGEAX
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 25.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
RFCYX vs. RGEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCYX Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund | 0.44% | 7.55% | 1.11% | 4.92% | -14.07% | -1.55% | 8.98% | 9.57% | -0.54% | 4.04% |
RGEAX Russell Investments Global Equity Fund | 9.27% | 20.92% | 15.25% | 22.12% | -16.78% | 22.30% | 12.95% | 25.89% | -9.41% | 22.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCYX and RGEAX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | -0.08 |
The correlation between RFCYX and RGEAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFCYX vs. RGEAX — Risk / Return Rank
RFCYX
RGEAX
RFCYX vs. RGEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Russell Investments Global Equity Fund (RGEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFCYX | RGEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.64 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 11.86 | -7.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFCYX vs. RGEAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum RGEAX drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCYX and RGEAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCYX | RGEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.34% | -56.78% | +37.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -9.51% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.33% | -20.24% | +13.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.34% | -25.91% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.34% | -34.85% | +15.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -0.41% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -9.12% | +5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 2.12% | -1.06% |
Volatility
RFCYX vs. RGEAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) is 1.17%, while Russell Investments Global Equity Fund (RGEAX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that RFCYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFCYX | RGEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 4.67% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 10.09% | -7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78% | 12.53% | -8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 16.57% | -10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 17.21% | -12.20% |
RFCYX vs. RGEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCYX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RGEAX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFCYX vs. RGEAX - Dividend Comparison
RFCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than RGEAX's 7.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCYX Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund | 5.23% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.13% | 7.15% | 3.70% | 2.41% | 1.29% | 4.92% | 4.06% |
RGEAX Russell Investments Global Equity Fund | 7.62% | 8.33% | 7.28% | 1.04% | 1.67% | 6.85% | 29.97% | 13.77% | 15.65% | 13.13% | 8.21% | 11.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFCYX and RGEAX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGEAX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to RFCYX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFCYX dropped -19.34% vs RGEAX's -56.78%.
RGEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFCYX and RGEAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer