PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFCYX vs. HOBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFCYX vs. HOBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFCYX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than HOBIX's 2.32% return.


RFCYX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.14%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*
1.67%

HOBIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.77%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFCYX vs. HOBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
-0.01%7.55%1.11%4.92%-14.07%-1.55%8.98%9.57%-0.54%4.04%
HOBIX
Holbrook Income Fund Class I
2.32%7.67%7.66%5.65%-2.91%6.13%7.45%7.70%1.74%2.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RFCYX and HOBIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.26

The correlation between RFCYX and HOBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFCYX vs. HOBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFCYX
RFCYX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RFCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
RFCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

HOBIX
HOBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HOBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
HOBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFCYX vs. HOBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFCYXHOBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

4.86

-3.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

12.81

-11.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

44.59

-39.41

RFCYX vs. HOBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the HOBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFCYX and HOBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFCYXHOBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

3.25

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

1.63

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.85

-0.10

Drawdowns

RFCYX vs. HOBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum HOBIX drawdown of -23.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCYX and HOBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFCYXHOBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-23.52%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-0.51%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-2.77%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.34%

-4.16%

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-0.10%

-3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-0.97%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.15%

+0.85%

Volatility

RFCYX vs. HOBIX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) at 0.54%. This indicates that RFCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFCYXHOBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.54%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

1.59%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84%

2.01%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

2.65%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

5.73%

-0.73%

RFCYX vs. HOBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFCYX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HOBIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFCYX vs. HOBIX - Dividend Comparison

RFCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than HOBIX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOBIX
Holbrook Income Fund Class I
6.30%6.45%7.04%6.35%5.31%3.97%6.30%3.51%4.32%2.12%0.00%0.00%
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
5.25%5.18%4.89%2.77%2.77%2.13%7.15%3.70%2.41%1.29%4.92%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFCYX and HOBIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFCYX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to HOBIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFCYX dropped -19.34% vs HOBIX's -23.52%.

HOBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFCYX and HOBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer