HOBIX vs. TGRNX
HOBIX (Holbrook Income Fund Class I) and TGRNX (TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, HOBIX returned 4.33%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for TGRNX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOBIX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for TGRNX.
Performance
HOBIX vs. TGRNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOBIX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than TGRNX's 0.68% return.
HOBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- —
TGRNX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
HOBIX vs. TGRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOBIX Holbrook Income Fund Class I | 2.43% | 7.67% | 7.66% | 5.65% | -2.91% | 6.13% | 7.45% | 7.70% | -1.78% |
TGRNX TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund | 0.68% | 6.76% | 3.08% | 5.73% | -13.43% | -0.60% | 8.57% | 9.15% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOBIX and TGRNX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2018 | 0.34 |
The correlation between HOBIX and TGRNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOBIX vs. TGRNX — Risk / Return Rank
HOBIX
TGRNX
HOBIX vs. TGRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOBIX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.31 | 1.65 | +1.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 10.66 | 2.57 | +8.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.19 | 1.31 | +3.88 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.03 | 2.44 | +11.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 48.98 | 8.05 | +40.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOBIX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31 | 1.65 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.64 | 0.08 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.54 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
HOBIX vs. TGRNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, which is greater than TGRNX's maximum drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOBIX and TGRNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOBIX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -17.85% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.51% | -2.47% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.77% | -3.99% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.16% | -17.85% | +13.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.78% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -5.23% | +4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.15% | 0.75% | -0.60% |
Volatility
HOBIX vs. TGRNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) is 0.53%, while TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that HOBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOBIX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 1.06% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 2.31% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01% | 3.15% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 4.84% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 4.82% | +0.92% |
HOBIX vs. TGRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOBIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRNX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOBIX vs. TGRNX - Dividend Comparison
HOBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than TGRNX's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOBIX Holbrook Income Fund Class I | 6.29% | 6.45% | 7.04% | 6.35% | 5.31% | 3.97% | 6.30% | 3.51% | 4.32% | 2.12% |
TGRNX TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund | 4.29% | 4.31% | 4.48% | 3.30% | 2.69% | 2.76% | 4.20% | 4.38% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOBIX and TGRNX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGRNX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to HOBIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOBIX dropped -23.52% vs TGRNX's -17.85%.
HOBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOBIX and TGRNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer